By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Baalzamon said:
pizzahut451 said:
vlad321 said:
DélioPT said:

No, it`s because it contains the words from God and Jesus, along with his life. And that is defining to those who believe. That`s why we call it sacred and not just very important or very meaningful.


Ok and King Arthur contains the words of Arthur and Lancelot and Merlin, among a bunch of others. Why isn't that sacred?


Because its made up by man. And people believe New Testament are the words of son of God .A God or higher power is something people believed in ever since their brain was developed enough to think. It all comes own to fatih, after all (weather you believe God is made up by man or higher power really exists)

That's just it.  I think the argument he is making is that the Bible was written by man just as much as any other book (history or otherwise) was written by man.  Whether or not history books claim the bible is the words of the son of god, that was also written in history.  People fabricate things, if not for the sole purpose of lying, but for the purpose of making things work how they want them to.  There is absolutely no way to prove that what the Bible says has truth to it, unless God would literally ascend down from heaven in front of me, and tell me..."Son, the bible contains only the truth."  The same exact goes for King Arthur.  I don't know if everything written in history books is exactly what happened, nor is there any way to prove this.

Someone else with a voice of reason to see exactly where I am going with this. Thank you.



Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."

HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374

Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420

gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835