By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kamiyama said:
Jumpin said:
kitler53 said:

should the US regret trying to wage a war on terrorism?   just because the fight is hard and the enemy is elusive doesn't mean the fight isn't worth fighting.


The US hasn't been fighting terrorism, they have been fighting Islamic countries and killing hundreds of thousands of people; and making the lives of millions more miserable. The whole "War on terrorism" does not exist; it is merely a marketing term to get fools to support the hundreds of billions of tax payer dollars being spent on weapons for wars against oil rich countries.

 

Sony hasn't done anything even remotely as evil as what the US government has been doing.

So if that's true why's China (our "allegedy" future enemy) getting a chunk of that oil. Another crack pot i hate politics cause of this. OK so you don't believe in islamic extremist?

There are obviously Islamic extremists, but would you bomb all of the Southern United States, killing hundreds of thousands, because of the KKK and white supremacy? Would you bomb all of Ireland because of Irish nationalism and the IRA? What the US did in the Islamic countries was an act of evil, no matter how you try to spin it.

 

The point is, suggesting that the US fight on terrorism is the same as the Sony fight on hackers is false. First of all, the fight on the hackers is an actual fight, the "war on terrorism" is about declaring war on Islamic countries, not finding terrorists. If it was the equivalent, then most of the world except for a few neo-nazis here in Europe, and right wing yeehaws in the US believe that the war on Islamic countries is anything less than an evil act; therefore, the statement makes Sony look evil; but in fact, they were following the law, something the US and their business partners didn't do when they invaded Iraq.



I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.