By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sapphi_snake said:
vlad321 said:
sapphi_snake said:
vlad321 said:

I am surprised you guys are pissed about this and not why homosexuality isn't in the "family life curriculum," in the first place.

I actually wanted to write about that, but you beat me to it. Damn homophobes. Trying to hijack "family life".


Well, technically you can't have a natural family if you are a homosexual couple, so given the label it does what it says it is.

So? Saying something like that also demeans heterosexual couples who can't concieve children. It even demeans adopted children, and stresses that they're not "really" part of the family. Of course these peopel don't take that into account, because they only really want to hurt and demean gays at all costs.


Well if they call it family life, and insist on it being natural, then yes, it will be insulting to thos groups. It's tough, but that is reality. If they want to talk about raising children no matter who the "parents" are, then call it somethinig else. You should be pushing for a program other than the one labeled "family life curriculum" to account for those people.



Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."

HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374

Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420

gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835