By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
CGI-Quality said:
ImJustBayuum said:
CGI-Quality said:
dsage01 said:
ImJustBayuum said:
Reasonable said:

Seems to be selling okay for a Killzone game to me.  How else should it be selling?


Like a Halo game.


Exactly my point!

A game in a franchise that deosn't sell like Halo should sell like a Halo game?

*does not compute *

It doesnt. But

-People know that Halo is one of the top selling FPS games.
-But generally don't know how much a specific franchise's game is sold.

Because of this uncertainty/lack of knowledge, the former is used as the standard of comparison.

That changes nothing. Halo isn't a good metric when comparing sales to something that's always sold at least 2 times less than it.

For a Killzone game, Killzone 3's sales are about what the franchise does (give or take 100k or so right now). Halo shouldn't be used as a way to minimize not only Killzone, but nearly any and every FPS franchise on the market. Only Call of Duty sells on comparable (or higher) levels and we know with the amount of FPS titles released just this gen, that makes it an obvious exception.

It's one of the reasons I've avoided posting much in here. The topic was flawed from the very first post (OP).


but why? it just does?

why cant this game be huge like a halo or COD, imo its 100x better. why cant this franchise be bigger. it doesnt seem right to say its selling well for what it is