ImJustBayuum said:
dsage01 said:
ImJustBayuum said:
CGI-Quality said:
A game in a franchise that deosn't sell like Halo should sell like a Halo game?
*does not compute *
|
It doesnt. But
-People know that Halo is one of the top selling FPS games.
-But generally don't know how much a specific franchise's game is sold.
Because of this uncertainty/lack of knowledge, the former is used as the standard of comparison.
|
Okay maybe I was a little off. Halo does deserve it's sales. But Killzone deserves a lot more. I have to admit Killzone was horrible Killzone 2 was good but way too hyped. Killzone 3 is the best fps ever so far but there was hardly any hype. The 87 kind of took people off. It's not a halo or GT that it can get a 75 meta (gt5 prolouge) and sell over 5 million. Or be a crap game like ODST. Give the reviewers money and make it get a metascore of 89.
|
The problem is you are using review scores and sales as the absolute measures of quality of a game. I understand your point IF the game is selling so low that the franchise is at risk of not releasing the next version.
|
Not exactly. Reach got better scores than Killzone 3 but I prefer Killzone 3 better. And GG will definelty make another Killzone game. And Killzone 3 has some pretty good sales. But what I'm trying to state is that Killzone is an amazing FPS series. Argubaly one of the best. But it doesn't get the sales it deserves.(I'm note saying the sales should be as big as Halo)
