By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
dsage01 said:
ImJustBayuum said:
CGI-Quality said:

A game in a franchise that deosn't sell like Halo should sell like a Halo game?

*does not compute *

It doesnt. But

-People know that Halo is one of the top selling FPS games.
-But generally don't know how much a specific franchise's game is sold.

Because of this uncertainty/lack of knowledge, the former is used as the standard of comparison.

Okay maybe I was a little off. Halo does deserve it's sales. But Killzone deserves a lot more. I have to admit Killzone was horrible Killzone 2 was good but way too hyped. Killzone 3 is the best fps ever so far but there was hardly any hype. The 87 kind of took people off. It's not a halo or GT that it can get a 75 meta (gt5 prolouge) and sell over 5 million. Or be a crap game like ODST. Give the reviewers money and make it get a metascore of 89.

The problem is you are using review scores and sales as the absolute measures of quality of a game. I understand your point IF the game is selling so low that the franchise is at risk of not releasing the next version.