Rpruett said:
1. ) Call of Duty is a bigger franchise, the start of this you did not mention a specific platform. Your fault, no one elses. Even as a specific platform, Call of Duty regularly has more people playing and has appealed to various console user bases (Something Halo couldn't accomplish, it's experience on PC was pretty miserable as a whole). 3.) You most certainly are someone who defends a piece of code and you have been for quite sometime from posts I have read from you in the past. (Halo fan to the extreme). You think that Halo has a great story and they have conveyed that well in their games. You think the sun rises and sets on Halo's amazing self. And to jump out and say 'poor 360 fans get treated terriblez!!' give me a break, please. 360 fans that make sense and don't spew total non-sense get treated the same as Nintendo or Sony fans who don't spew total non-sense either. Some fans, who claim every game is the best graphical game on the planet (When it's clearly not) and continuously get proven wrong obviously don't get respect for obvious reasons. The biggest problem I have witnessed with some 360 fans is that they feel that sales of a specific title (Halo is a great example) must mean that it's one of the best games to ever exist. The reality is sales have a lot more to do with marketing, type of game versus userbase, amount of games out concurrently, widespread public appeal (Moms, Dads, Kids, Teenagers, etc) random public hype more than anything truly tangible like game quality, content, etc. For example, the 360 and Halo is an American company with American-centric advertising, sales tactics, creating an American appealed game, with limited competition on their system, on a system primarily with a US presence, that also benefitted from public hype and a quality original game with a mature enough demeanor to attract teenagers and college students and a immature enough appeal (Lack of serious blood or gore) to get the green light from parents for younger children. Is it really any surprise that a game like Halo has sold well for two generations especially on the 360? Compare that to the PS3 and Sony. With Euro/Japan Centric appeal and flare, with the worst sales in the American market, obviously it's not going to do as well in the FPS department. Mind you, it has it's strengths versus the 360 but FPS's aren't one of them.
|
Not sure if your being serious here or not. Its pretty much unanimous in agreement 360 fans are vastly outnumbered on this site, and that their voice gets pretty drowned out by everyone else. I mean the proof is everywhere in comparison to fans of the other consoles the 360 fans are a small minority. Obviously the 360 will have "fanboys" and "trolls" same as any other platform. I've never claimed their better than anyone else, just that many debates are unbalanced due to them being vastly outnumbered, thus the main reason why I usually stick up for the 360 and its fans, so the debates will be somewhat balanced.
And so what if I'm a big Halo fan? Does that stop me from enjoying other FPS? Last I checked I gave Killzone 3 a 9.7 in my review, have claimed multiple times I believe its the graphics King, and have a Platinum trophy on it. I wonder can you honestly say or prove that you have played both Killzone and Halo extensively as I have?
Think carefully before you accuse and slander others as being overly biased, especially users who have a proven track record of being pretty fair for the most part.







