By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Icyedge said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
Mr Khan said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
Aiddon said:

I'm not sure if I want to believe this. Nintendo has already they have new content in the pipeline anyway and it seems that most people are predicting a Wii 2 just because Nintendo doesn't have much content for it (mostly due to the 3DS launch)


That and those that wanted the Wii to go away in 2006.

A lot of those people seem to be dominating the discourse surrounding this, saying stuff like "if Nintendo wants to be relevant again, this console will have X."

I say it's the games that will make them relevant, not the system.

What do you mean by relevant? Selling as much as the Wii or selling like their competitors? Im asking because the hardware did great for the Wii.


I mean mainstream relevance.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs