Questions About Bulletstorm

[vlad321]

Mr Puggsly said:

vlad321 said:

What depth? It has exactly as much depth as the others, which is get a gun and kill as many enemies as you can. It jsut happens to lack any of the "WHAT THE FUCK" factor of the originals.

Which mostly simplistic titles? I can name you a huge list of games which are far deeper than anything out this generatoin.

Just because you may be in the luck few % which have no problems with GFWL, does not mean GFWL isn't a terrible system which many have problems with.

Which i defended successfully while you stuck your fingers in yoru ears and basically shouted "lalalallalala," or came up with excuses a 4 year old would.

No, Bulletstorm has more depth. Better level design, superior multiplayer, more variety, etc. Anyway, you brag about not playing new games so how do you know anything about new games?

GFWL is not a terrible system. Not perfect either, but most people get it working. That's PC gaming for you, a pain in the ass sometimes.

Sure you did... you can claim victory but that doesn't make it so. Now lets pretend we aren't two years old.

Wait level design? Bullettorm was a line, literally a line. At least SS and Painkiller had weird places like an opera with killer samurai you could explore, and no hand holding. I know plenty about new games because I get through the first few hours before I realize how terribly boring due to dumbing down they are.

There is a difference between a pain in the ass, and just plain broken system that shouldn't exist. GFWL is the latter.

Well let's see, I provided evidence, and logical backing to my arguments. You provided no backing, and poor logic.