pizzahut451 said:
dib8rman said:
pizzahut451 said:
dib8rman said:
pizzahut451 said:
dib8rman said:
pizzahut451 said:
So your whole point: Atheist belief system >>> Theist belief system. Yeah, ok, cool story
Still doesnt disprove what I said in the first place. You try to explain stuff that doesnt matter.
|
I'm not sure if you even read my post, I didn't compare the two points. Your actually incorrect their as well, Atheism isn't a belief system that is comparible to Theist belief systems. Apples and oranges.
The crux of a theist belief system is found through faith, in otherwords drawing conclusions for things in the absence of evidence, the reason it isn't comparible is because Atheists can't make the assumption nor it's opposite. Instead Atheists say and this is a quote, Unicorns could exist but for all that we know they do not and life goes on regardless of believing in them or not.
Again, I didn't compare them I keep saying this and this will be my last time saying it.
Stalin did kill theists for their beliefs so far as their beliefs were with effect on the ideology of the people he wished to subjugate. This was the same reason he killed everyone else which throws out the shock of value by saying he gunned down Theists because they believed in god. In the end Stalin became an arguable saint of the Russian orthodoxy so with that said it's clear he didn't care what ideology propped him up so long as he remained in power.
|
And how is that ANY diffrent thna what have I said? He kiled theists for being theists. What he did to other people is absolutely irrelevant to my point, because I didnt even mentioned them
|
Your arguing his motivation, you sadly couldn't solve the syllogism and no matter how plainly I put it you still can't put two and two together. If you cared to bolden and underline the line after that you will note that I said "This was the same reason he killed everyone else..." in otherwords he killed because of ideologies and that is the plain and no more plainly can that point be made. Actually yes, there is one way to describe it in simpler form:
In Stalin communism it was Stalin's way or the highway. The highway usually involves death.
Your argument is dual part:
Stalin killed theists because he was communist thus Atheist and to repeat the consequence by your logic: Stalin killed theists because they believed in god.
Your logic would be at least accurate if he didn't kill Atheists for holding Atheist friendly ideologies as well.
Anarchism is arguably the best Atheist friendly ideological world view however Stalin made sure to be rid of it first and all those who wanted it.
|
He DID that for those EAXCT same reasons. Again, your point?
|
You do realize that the part you underlined was me simplifying the part of your argument that I've been addressing. That all the information around that goes to combat that line of logic with a better logic; or at least a line of logic that takes into account more than just what I want to hear or see,
|
How were you adressing my point? I said Stalin was an atheist who killed theists with his atheism supported regime. You than said (as far as i understood) that it didnt matter he was an atheist who killed theist because he also killed other people who werent theists because he is simply a dictator. How does that in any way ''adress'' my point I'll never know
|
I said many things two of them were that:
Stalin killed Atheists as well and subsequently he killed anyone with an ideology that did not make him master.
/end ?
It's called totalitarianism.
