LordTheNightKnight said:
miz1q2w3e said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
You think the 3DS cost nothing to research and make? I still think it's not the right direction, but I don't think it was cheap.
|
I doubt their game development studios had anything to do with R&D/making the 3DS, maybe one or two of them were involved in 3DS firmware/OS/built in games - Otherwise, what is it about 3DS that leads you to believe that the device making itself hogged enough resources to nearly halt game develpement on all their other platforms?
Besides, as I already wrote, allegedly focusing on the 3DS is no excuse for the biggest publisher on earth to be in this type of situation - Last quarter was no better: http://features.metacritic.com/features/2011/25-best-wii-games/ sad
|
1. You think the money for hardware development and the money for game developmet are magically separate? That is what that comment implied. If they are spending money on a major system, they will have less money at the time for some of their games.
2. You're using metacritic to judge the money Nintendo is making. Reviews are NOT SALES.
|
No, he is looking at how terrible the Q1 lineup was, there is just no excuse, Q2 is even more horrible than Q1, I even wonder why Nintendo released that list, it was just to embarass themselves.