By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
thranx on 10 April 2011
Edit Thread
Mr Puggsly said:
vlad321 said:

Which part? Because graphically the PC games are leaps ahead of the console ones. If you mean gameplay, I hate to break it to you, but my 15 year old brother can make better level design and originality than the crap they have going on in your high budget games. I want you to tell me the exact points of games which make them high budget.

It is absolutely astounding what bullshit your mind can come up with to prevent you from adimitting you are wrong.

I'm not denying PC still delievers the best graphics, but when I say quality I don't just mean graphics. When was the last time a PC exclusive got GOTY? And I don't mean RTS of the year. It doesn't happen because the truly high quality games people love can't rely on the PC (unless its an online game like WoW, because that can't be stolen.)

 

Any Blizzard game says hello hear. Or are they lacking in quality? Do they rely on consoles?

I'm no longer going to respond on this page. But if you'd like to take it to my wall, feel free.


so quality to you is what other people tell you it is? (reviews only)

I think alot of people consider quality to be lack of bugs in games. A well rounded game that has all the trimmings and isn't lacking in any major area. A game that is a finished project and does need updates day one.

Now with that said i am not going to say pc game offer more quality than console games, or vice versa. Its too general and too big of a market on both ends. There are quality titles in both markets and titles in both markets that are considered unfinished by the fans that buy them day one.