By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
megaman79 said:
mrstickball said:

After reading up on PPP, they are a Democrat pollister firm which is usually employed by Democrats to provide biased, targeted polling. They've readily admitted to it, too.:

http://mediatrackers.org/2011/03/public-policy-poll-overrepresented-union-househoulds-in-poll/

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0609/24062.html

According to PPP, they were paid to poll North Carolina's senatorial seat in 2010, and stated that Richard Burr was one of the most vunerable candidates in the nation. In reality, Mr. Burr won the seat by the largest majority in state history: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Burr#2010_Senate_campaign

Hold on. You can't source right wing articles as evidence for biased left wing polling companies, that makes no sense.

And regardless, 400 people is enough to guage a significant enough opinion on one single minor issue (its minor because racial segregation is illegal, end of story).


You think Politico is a right wing website?  Seriously?  Is CNN a rightwing news network in your mind?

Basically none of Politco's articles at all talk of ideology.... outside of the opinon page.

 

And their two opinon writers are Michael Kinsley and Joe Scarborough.

Who Steven Colbert put it "I love Joe Scarborough's show because he keeps me guessing, I never know if he's going to be a republican or a democrat on a daily basis..."