| mrstickball said: After reading up on PPP, they are a Democrat pollister firm which is usually employed by Democrats to provide biased, targeted polling. They've readily admitted to it, too.: http://mediatrackers.org/2011/03/public-policy-poll-overrepresented-union-househoulds-in-poll/ http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0609/24062.html According to PPP, they were paid to poll North Carolina's senatorial seat in 2010, and stated that Richard Burr was one of the most vunerable candidates in the nation. In reality, Mr. Burr won the seat by the largest majority in state history: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Burr#2010_Senate_campaign |
Hold on. You can't source right wing articles as evidence for biased left wing polling companies, that makes no sense.
And regardless, 400 people is enough to guage a significant enough opinion on one single minor issue (its minor because racial segregation is illegal, end of story).
“When we make some new announcement and if there is no positive initial reaction from the market, I try to think of it as a good sign because that can be interpreted as people reacting to something groundbreaking. ...if the employees were always minding themselves to do whatever the market is requiring at any moment, and if they were always focusing on something we can sell right now for the short term, it would be very limiting. We are trying to think outside the box.” - Satoru Iwata - This is why corporate multinationals will never truly understand, or risk doing, what Nintendo does.
