kowenicki said:
Zkuq said:
kowenicki said:
Zlejedi said:
TheSource said:
We've been through this before if price was everything PS2, at $99 would be outselling everything rather easily. Price Cuts & TIMING make the difference.
PS3 isn't going to be under $200 until 2012 or later. PS2 was $200 in 2002.
2000 ---> 2002 vs. 2006 ---> 2012 is completely different from a timing perspective.
I also have trouble with the whole idea that people really cant afford $300. How hard is it to save $25 a month for a year? Thats how I used to buy games when I was in middle school and highschool. Some people won't buy because they think PS3 isn't worth $300 but thats a different issue.
The other problem with this argument is Wii & X360. Both are still $200. Do you think Wii has only sold 1/5 of its eventual penetration because it isn't a "mass market" price yet?
|
Not everyone lives in America
For some territories 300$ can be a half of monthly salary (minimum salary in Poland is 350 euro, average is 800 but people in student age often get 500-600) and there are places in the world where people are lucky to get 200$ per month.
Also lower price point makes it easier to buy it as second or third machine for hardcore gamers.
|
350 euros is $500, 800 euros is $1,142
|
Your point?
|
i was clarifying... my main point you have edited out.
your point?
|
Well, the rest seemed unimportant in regard to this statement, and still seems. My point? What I quoted you say doesn't matter in the slightest because while we have higher income here in Europe, we also have higher prices - for example, a console costing $299 in the US costs 299€ or more here. I think someone said it before me, just wanted to clarify my point myself.