By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 said:
pizzahut451 said:
Kasz216 said:
pizzahut451 said:
Kasz216 said:
pizzahut451 said:
Kasz216 said:
pizzahut451 said:
Kasz216 said:
pizzahut451 said:
 

I can see how people think what geohotz is doing is legal, but Bleem? Those motherfuckers deserved to go down, their entire fucking team forever


I can't see how people can think what Bleem did was illegal.  Considering they won in court.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleem!#Sony_lawsuit

I cant see how people think that Sony getting IPs from youtube and Geohotz s web site is illegal, considering it was approved by the court...

That would be because all previous case law ruled against it.  Unlike the Bleem case that was totally consistant with case law.


I got my answer...

So we can use courts desicion as mesure legality as long as its against sony?

I... have no idea what your trying to ask there.

Though yes, case law is against sony in both cases... the youtube supeona is only holding up because nobody has bothered to try and file a motion to quash it and Geohotz actually agreed to let sony look because he doesn't think they'll find anything.

 

To claim otherwise would either be an act of ignroance of the law or illogical support for Sony.


You cant say what Bleem did was legal because the court said so and say that Sony taking IPs from web sites is illegal even though the court said otherwise

Er, yes I can?  It's called citing case law.

I mean, it's like you don't know how the court system works or how supeona's work.

Supeona's basically ALWAYS err on the side of caution, often to the point of illegal actions when it comes to big companies.  With the theory being, if the people who are being served with supeona care enough about their rights being violated they will file a motion to quash.


And you think what Bleem did wasnt illegal but Sony taking IPs was? If what Sony did actually was illegal than that supeona would be filled agaisnt Sony (correct me if it is

Again, your coming off as kinda incoherent and sloppy here.  I'm not sure what your trying to ask.

Do you think that making money off Sony PlayStation games (without the permission from Sony) its ok but getting IPs to prove people used Geohotz code is not?