By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
oniyide said:

^^^ maybe im blind but i see absolutely no evidence at all to suggest that the games you and i like to play are going to stop being made in lieu of stuff like Angry Birds.  As for elitism, you might be right, but who decides what is the lowest common denominator or not??? You??? me?? some college grad??? Im not trying to be a wise ass, but who decides? If you look at stuff like angry birds, twilight, and Transformers as on the low end i would agree with you. But heres the thing, IMHO the people who like that crap and dont want to try to go further, far outweigh people who do. You dont know how many times ive asked different people why they play those games and not something like, i dont know, SF. the common answer is. its too complicated. plus people are cheap 


There isn't just a cutoff but you stated point right there at the end. Lowest common denominator spawns simple entertainment. It's called the least common denominator because it appeals to the broadest amount of people which includes the huge percentage which are just plain idiots. It's perfect from a business perspective, and terrible from a cultural perspective.



Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."

HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374

Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420

gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835