Mr Puggsly said:
You say used sales are as damaging as piracy with no argument. Your statment has no ground. One key thing to remember about used games on the market is they were sold and the publishers/developers made a profit for that sale at one time. A pirated game was never sold and no profit was ever made. Hence, piracy is more damaging and too many PC gamers are used to their games being free. Your argument about games sucking this generation is an opinion and irrelevant. Regardless how you feel about them, many PC gamers are still playing them but too many are stealing. That's hurting the PC gaming industry more so than consoles ever could. |
And you state piracy is damaging without an argument. Your statement has no ground as well. My argument is simple. When you go buy a game used, the developer sees nothing. You play the game for free, as far as the developer is concerned. Same as piracy.
A pirated game is also bought initially. Someone had to buy it to crack it open.
Explain to me then, why is it that piracy was not this rampant before this generation? Also explain to me how the better games on the PC don't see nowhere near as much piracy? SC2 was barely 5th last year, and many people thought it was a waste of money as well. Meanwhile Black Ops was barely out for 3 weeks and was #1 overwhelmingly. What you are saying, or what you want to believe, is not supported by the data, therefore you are wrong. Not to mention that there are many studies out there that p[irates spend more on media than non-pirates. That also kind of ruins your entire belief. I expect your pispoor counter-argument which will probably be debunked by statistics.
Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."
HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374
Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420
gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835








