SleepWaking said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
UncleScrooge said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
puffy said:
To those saying they don't think they'll use the 3D and don't own the system, you'll change your mind when you get time to play it in a comfortable setting i.e. not in a freaking store.
|
I don't think so.
But let's say it is. Then Nintendo blew it by having the 3D shown off in a place that would make them look worse.
So even if you're right, it actually makes it look MORE bleak for the system.
|
It's true. You get accustomed to the 3D after some while. At first everyone is trying to treat the screen like a normal 2D screen which makes everything look weird and blurry. But after some while you get used to it and stop focusing your eyes on everything at once.
Showing the device off in a store is not the best solution but what else should they do?
|
No, it's not the blurry aspect. I got used to that after seeing Captain EO at Disneyland about 20 years ago.
I mean that I won't use the 3D because it doesn't add anything. It doesn't make the games better, and don't tell me it will. It's not true depth perception. It still works just in layers.
|
So you can say that it won't make games better and I can't say it does??? In my opinion it ats a lot to the experience, more so than a few polygons and I am very happy Nintendo implemented it. Thus making games better!!
|
If the design is bad, it cannot make it good. If the design is already good, it would be good without 3D vision. That is why it doesn't make the game better. It's the same with that high definition crap a couple years ago.* Plus games are for playing, not experiencing.
* BTW, my position was never for HD-DVD, but against the notion that the public was choosing blu-ray; the industry chose one side, not the mainstream.
