By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
radiantshadow92 said:
sergiodaly said:
radiantshadow92 said:

For this example i agree with you. But as a whole i do not see DLC as abuse, i see it as extra. You know what you are buying before you buy and anything extra comes at a price. Which is fine by me. I just wish Sucker Punch could do the same as EA sometimes because i want some inFAMOUS DLC xD

well i wish sucker punch never gets into that... inFamous was very good by its own and dont need anything else imo... and sucker punch is doing the efford so inFamous 2 will never ever need any type of DLC (other than new powers) since the comunity can build and upload missions so others can play user created missions, if you have that, what do you need DLC for???

Some new powers for inFAMOUS one would be great. I still play it, and see tons of bugs that could have been patched yet they show no support after the game was released. What up with that?! I mean yeah the game is amazing, but some dlc don't hurt.

fair enough... patchs are way different from DLC or payed DLC... i also think inFamous one could have some extra powers in DLC, but not payed DLC... things like that could be given away when you plat the game or something. Sucker Punch did not give much support after release, i will give you that... but payed DLC is not the anwser imo...



Proudest Platinums - BF: Bad Company, Killzone 2 , Battlefield 3 and GTA4