mantlepiecek said:
damefan said:
anikikim said:
These are the exact reasons why I think PSN is better. You read my mind dude. Even if XBL was free. I would still prefer PSN due to the dedicated servers. Games like Killzone 2, Mag, Resistance 2, and Socom 4 support way more players than what any xbox game can. So does xbl have any games that support over 30 players ? Guess not because they still use shitty P2P.
|
You have no idea what you are talking about. Killzone 2 has more players in multiplayer because that is how many players the devs wanted in the game. Mag could have 1,000,000 players and it would still suck, but once again a design choice, not cause PSN is "better" according to you. Socom 4 isn't even out yet. All of those games combined didn't sell as much as COD so I guess it doesn't matter if its P2P does it? This site should have an minimum IQ requirement before posting.
|
And all of those games put together don't have as much whining about lag as much as COD has. That just proves something doesn't it? 
Dedicated servers are wayy superior to P2P, don't even try to argue it. No host advantage, no lag, more players, less glitches(yes, glitches) and it also helps in people playing across the countries easily without lag. It usually doesn't require you to go around in your router settings messing with ports and stuff.
|
lag in call of duty?....when ive never had any glitches either sounds to me like your disk is scrathed lol.
