Wii first party library vs PS3 first party library?

[Torillian]

CGI-Quality said:

dsister said:

mantlepiecek said:

????????????????????????????

Both are first party. LBP is owned by Sony and made by Media molecule which is owned by Sony.

inFamous is owned by Sony and made by Sucker Punch who are second party, but infamous can't be published on any other platform(unless Sony wants it) because the IP is owned by Sony.

That makes it a first party game. Something like heavy rain is not first party strictly but infamous is. Sony can easily hire another developer(a first party developer) to develop the game, but they have more faith in Sucker Punch.

I have always counted first party as games made by first party studios. Neither Media Molecule or Sucker Punch were first party at the time of those games specific releases 

Your definition is strictly yours, but LBP & inFAMOUS are very much 1st Party titles.

I mean, by your definition, Halo & PGR aren't 1st party either.....which we know isn't the case.

Every Halo game made while Bungie the studio was owned by Microsoft is 1st party, any made with Bungie in the free and clear is 2nd party.  Similar to how Demon's Souls is a Sony owned IP made by a 3rd party developer making it a 2nd party game.