osamanobama said:
1st: still costs money 2nd: your spending money, your not recouping anything. thats like saying retaining tax rates, creates a defecit. guess what you cant be in debt if you dont spend money 3rd: depends on who you ask, at least on psn you still have the choice. there are small games (UNcharted and then therees MAG). with Live you dont have choice 4th: its better than not having one and its still free. i would rather have it than not. and it performs adequately |
Sure LIve still costs money but if its a rip off or not depends on how much you use it or how much you paid for it. How are you not recouping money on deals of the week if you are spending less money. The perfect way to implement online play is to start out with 16 player matches and increase it through updates once the game gets more users and once it becomes less popular decrease the number of players again. Browsers on a home console for the most part are still a bad idea. If people really wanted to browse the web on their home cosole that badly then last gen more consoles would already have had browsers besides the Dreamcast (which also had a web browser that perfomed adequately for its time but still was crab compared to a real browser).








