By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
zarx said:
ssj12 said:

It is obvious that Crysis 2 would look better on PC. That is a no brainer. But how much better? It seems to me, not as big of a gap as I would expect. The 360 version looks muddy compared to it, but it does look nice. I really wish they showed what medium and low looked like, because I'm fairly sure the 360 version would be a bit better looking than medium, based on the degrade between very high and high settings on PC. Still the 360 version does look quite good. Impressive actually based on many other titles released over the last year or two. Crytek did a nice job on the console version. I can see Crysis 2 being a graphical benchmark to beat for many companies over the rest of the 360's life.


there are only three settings max, very high and high...

>.< thats stupid as hell... why the hell didnt they call it low, medium, and high. I guess Crytek was trying to show off with their little DX9 game...? Seriously, this doesnt even have DX10 support... which is pathetic since the first was DX10 only! And actually since DX11 is out Crytek should have not been lazy as hell and supported it!

Honestly, I am not trying to talk up Crysis 2 in this thread, I never would, the game is average as hell and does not deserve any praise. I just figured I'd show that really the 360/PS3 versions are actually fairly close in visuals to this pos. Crytek sold their souls and made a worse looking and playing game than the original Crysis. And this actually shows why they shouldn't make sequels at all, which they never have till Crysis.



PC gaming is better than console gaming. Always.     We are Anonymous, We are Legion    Kick-ass interview   Great Flash Series Here    Anime Ratings     Make and Play Please
Amazing discussion about being wrong
Official VGChartz Folding@Home Team #109453