slowmo on 25 March 2011
greenmedic88 said:
It all stemmed from the fallacious belief that once you buy something, you are free to do anything with it. When that couldn't be proven by law, the arguments focused on the analogies instead. |
In fairness the entire debate is flawed because if it comes down to the simple point of you are only allowed to do stuff that isn't illegal then it brings you back to the beginning of why this case is going to the courts. Sony believe Mr Hotz actions are illegal, he maintains they aren't, one of these entities is going to be proven wrong and that will this end the debate on here regardless of who is morally right.
