By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sapphi_snake said:
mchaza said:

well Europe already have an cultural one child policy, same with japan. the rate Japan is at is that by 2100 there population will halve from what they have now. 

But i agree there are too much people and an one child policy will fail so an much more drastic solution would be depopulation by extreme radical War. Yet 1 massive war will reduce population around 2-3 billion people and resources consumed will drop around 50-80% because of the war and will last around 20-30 years and so the environments will recover in areas due to halt in resource consumption. 

Or the even more extreme and use biological weapons against countires that are poor and unsustainable. 

But by the time we all die off an our grand children are alive they are completely F***ed. if nothing drastic happens 

Yes, your solution is much better and more humane.

if WW2 killed around 100 million people then WW3 being that there are now 7 times more people, 700 million WMD (x 10), 7,000,000,000 deaths, We calculates to everyone on earth which is about right. 

Well the British use to murder everyone, and the only ones to be successful in genocide yet no one cares about it. So someone doing mass genoide happens to defeat some evil at one point will become the good guys. 



Of Course That's Just My Opinion, I Could Be Wrong