The thing is when you play Uncharted without comparing it to anything else, you won't notice anything bad about it. Nothing is BAD, unlike some other heavy hitters.
Whereas along with this Uncharted 2 manages to have very good character models, highly detailed environments and beautiful lighting as well.
Crysis 2 has texture pop-ins and shadow problems. Killzone 2 and 3 has low res textures.
And for the last fucking time, why are you guys quoting eurogamer again? Eurogamer says it sits next to Uncharted 2 as the most detailed console game. So that makes it look better? It actually compliments Uncharted 2 as being more detailed.
Gamespot and many others have been disappointed by the graphics on console. And they definitely don't think of it as the best looking game. So now its the benchmark because of it?
Seriously talk about trying too hard. If anything looks better it should be the majority of guys calling it better. The majority don't call it as the best looking, so now logically it must obviously be the best looking console game.
But one thing is certain. This gen if anything sets the benchmark, its going to be the PS3 exclusives. "Does this game look better than KZ3??" lol the PS3 exclusives pretty much had no competition in the last 1 1/2 years when so many people were talking about how the differences are so minimal. And now they are blown away by crysis 2 that doesn't even get more than 10 mentions as the top class graphical game.
And this game is certainly not going to win any technical awards this year because it has frame-rate problems and screen tearing. KZ3 has neither. If either of these two win the award it would be KZ3.
