By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
CGI-Quality said:
selnor said:
CGI-Quality said:

Some reviews:

http://attackofthefanboy.com/reviews/crysis-2-review/

http://www.statepress.com/2011/03/22/crytek-invents-a-revolutionary-masterpiece-in-crysis-2/

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&ie=UTF-8&sl=de&tl=en&u=http://www.gamesaktuell.de/Crysis-2-PS3-232045/Tests/Crysis-2-im-Test-fuer-PC-PS3-und-Xbox-360-Ist-der-Crytek-Shooter-besser-als-Killzone-3-816778/&prev=  - (9/10)

All mention how fun the single player is and how technically sound the visuals are (albeit with slight issues like texture pop in and glitchy AI). None sound like deal breakers and I'm headed to get the game here in a bit!

How did you get that about visuals from those reviews?????

The last says move over Killzone 3. ( Albeit translation is washy. )

The 2nd said although he knows nothing about FPS etc, Crysis 2 etched out many moments which his retinas will never forget.

One review says it sits besides the most technically sound games of the gen (the one you commented on - last one), but none of them say it's the best looking game on consoles. I'd wait for the bigger review sites though.

Well if its tied with the best looking games on consoles then isn't it the best looking game on consoles?

Crysis 2= A     Killzone 3=B    Every other game =C

If B>C and A=B then A>C