Words Of Wisdom on 09 January 2008
Bodhesatva said:
You do realize that I, personally, do not care, correct?
If you do not care then why did you start this "discussion?" Why are you replying at all?
I don't believe you're a troll so don't say this and begin acting like one. I have more respect for you than that.
Bodhesatva said:
You do not have to convince me that lower-level graphics are okay, and again, I certainly udnerstood that the PS3 would be capable of a game with lower-end graphics; for the nth time, that's why I used the phrase "PS3-level graphics." That phrase was repeated multiple times in my first post (the one that spawned our current conversation) and it was chosen precisely because I'm aware that the PS3 doesn't technically require graphics of that calibur.
You do not have to convince me that lower-level graphics are okay, and again, I certainly udnerstood that the PS3 would be capable of a game with lower-end graphics; for the nth time, that's why I used the phrase "PS3-level graphics." That phrase was repeated multiple times in my first post (the one that spawned our current conversation) and it was chosen precisely because I'm aware that the PS3 doesn't technically require graphics of that calibur.
Your phrase is wrong. You can repeat it as much and as often as you like and it will still be such.
Bodhesatva said:
Sony has worked tirelessly to convince people that they should expect flashy, expensive, epics like Heavenly Sword, Uncharted and upcoming games like Killzone 2. It is not surprising, then, that the owners of their system are, by and large, particularly concerned with receiving games of that graphical quality. There are people who do not care so much about graphics and production values -- and guess what systems they're buying? The PS2 and Wii.
Sony has worked tirelessly to convince people that they should expect flashy, expensive, epics like Heavenly Sword, Uncharted and upcoming games like Killzone 2. It is not surprising, then, that the owners of their system are, by and large, particularly concerned with receiving games of that graphical quality. There are people who do not care so much about graphics and production values -- and guess what systems they're buying? The PS2 and Wii.
So everyone who owns a Wii automatically ONLY cares about "casual" games then because Nintendo has been pushing them? For you to believe what you just said about Sony and PS3 owners, you must also believe this about Nintendo and Wii owners. I'm sorry, but making sweeping generalizations about millions of people is bound to be erroneous at some level or all levels.
