By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
radiantshadow92 on 20 March 2011
Edit Thread
irstupid said:
radiantshadow92 said:
irstupid said:

rating systems before out is just dumb, they should be rated after at minimum a year

btw anyone know other ign scores?

i couldn't find original psp score, but saw ps3 got a 6/10

also 2 hours? i have yet to see ANYWHERE else state anything less than 3 EVER. 

was this 2 hours off the original "half-charge" that the battery came like when he opened box?


Ummmm no. They have to rate the system so people know what they are getting before they buy it. Much like a game.

GAMES make the system

here take your favorite games on the ps3 and move them ALL off the PS3 and make them 360 exclusives now.  Which system is better now?

now what did 360 change?  nothing, it didn't get slimmer, it didn't get more ram, bigger harddrive, quieter, sleeker, ect.  It just got a bunch of great games. 

The only thing worth reviewing a new system on is reviewing their Launch Lineup.

I totally disagree. We have gotten to the point where the systems do more than gaming. It would be like just reviewing a cell phone on call quality. That is just stupid. They should review the hardware and post whether it is a smart investment for the price and for the games currently at launch and later coming out, which is what IGN has done well imo.