Acevil said:
JoeTheBro said:
irstupid said:
radiantshadow92 said:
irstupid said:
rating systems before out is just dumb, they should be rated after at minimum a year
btw anyone know other ign scores?
i couldn't find original psp score, but saw ps3 got a 6/10
also 2 hours? i have yet to see ANYWHERE else state anything less than 3 EVER.
was this 2 hours off the original "half-charge" that the battery came like when he opened box?
|
Ummmm no. They have to rate the system so people know what they are getting before they buy it. Much like a game.
|
GAMES make the system
here take your favorite games on the ps3 and move them ALL off the PS3 and make them 360 exclusives now. Which system is better now?
now what did 360 change? nothing, it didn't get slimmer, it didn't get more ram, bigger harddrive, quieter, sleeker, ect. It just got a bunch of great games.
The only thing worth reviewing a new system on is reviewing their Launch Lineup.
|
But if the PS3 games were on 360 they would have worse graphics and need extra discs. The hardware allows good games, good games don't make good hardware.
|
You do know PS3 got a 6/10 from IGN, logic does not exist for that site. He was just point out how stupid it is review hardware. Also good games do make or break the hardware, you could have the best technology, but if you have no support, it will be game over.
|
Really?! I would have given it a 4 LOL
