By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Aldro on 18 March 2011
Edit Thread
selnor said:
ethomaz said:
selnor said:
ethomaz said:
Nsanity said:
ethomaz said:
selnor said:
The media are the ones you are quoting. Game Reactor said Crysis 2 is fighting with those games. I didnt.

Nope. Game Reactor said Uncharted 2 is better.

Since when did reviewer opinions become facts?

For me? Never.

I just said that reviewer said something else.


So what your saying is the reviewer claimed one thing in the review everyone will read. And something entirely different in a forum. Seems the reviewer has a split personality.

He wasn't claimed that in his review.

His words in his review:

"  The amount of detail is insane, and the effects are incredible. The console versions are, of course, not as fancy as on the PC, but they are still fighting for the top spots when it comes to being the graphical kings for their respective formats."

http://www.gamereactor.eu/reviews/6760/Crysis 2/?amp

Fighting for the top spot is not the same as claiming the top spot. He answered a fanmail with a statement and a clear one, that Uncharted 2 remains on top and the fact that he won't answer whether its better than Gears 2 or not, makes it pretty clear that the console version is NOT the new .."graphics king" if you will. He did however claim Killzone 3 to be on par with Uncharted 2, and not worse.

He's already said it, its there. If you decide to ignore his own words, then theres really no point in talking to you. Im not saying the game isn't good looking at all, im just stating that Uncharted 2 and Killzone 3 are better looking according to the cheif editor of Sweden which also appears to be so highly regarded that they translated his review to the EU mag ^^.