By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
mantlepiecek said:
selnor said:
mantlepiecek said:
selnor said:

Also From the Game Reactor review I reaD WHICH IS ON metacritic it says the game ( Crysis 2 ) Fights at the top fpr Graphics King on Both PS3 and 360. So at the very least they confirm it's as good as KZ3, U2 or GOW3.

Now you are entitled to your opinion, but from what I read as fighting for the top spots it looked like it lost but is there in the top with gears of war 2.

You are the only guy who has even talked about its graphics like its great or something, even OXM hasn't mentioned graphics in their review and that is suspiscious to me.

Whatever footage they have shown of the console versions all of them look pale in front of killzone 2 so I am not sure how they will suddenly come up with the best looking console title, without even utilising MLAA on the PS3? No special effects that I have seen worth mentioning either.

When KZ3 released it was pretty much black and white from every other reviewer so it was pretty much given its either this or god of war that's thebest looking.


I'm not gonna get drawn into an arguement about my opinions on PS3 exclusives. However Gears 2 is not even at the top of 360 graphics. I own Alan Wake, Reach and Gears 2. Alan Wake is the king on 360 right now, followed by Reach due to the the awesome Engine, it's not just about small levels and high textures. Gears 2 is good. But Gears 3 needs to improve a fair bit to match Alan Wake let alone Crysis 2.

Did you just say Halo Reach has better graphics then Gears of war 2?

You are right, no point arguing.

Halo:Reach does have better graphics than Gears of War 2. Gears of War 3 on the other hand will destroy both.