Immortal said:
Not that I disagree with what you were initially saying. It's rather disappointing that Sony gets more praise for suing a hacker for a million bucks than it does for making a charitable donation. Regardless of random ulterior motives, good job, Sony. |
Well, the truth hurts. The bottom line here is that any good deed brings some benefit to the giver - even if it is intangible. The sooner everyone realizes this, then the sooner people can stop trying to belittle one source's contributions and glorify another.
Let me put it another way... Sony gets good PR from this, so does Nintendo and MS. Good for them. BUT it the contributions were needed, so what difference does it make. Plus, these are sizable amounts of money for any corporation. What frustrates me are the people who bash one contributer (in this thread it happens to be Gates and co.) as being disingenuous while failing to realize that (at some level) every donator has considered the potential positive ramifications of donation.
This does NOT mean that the PRIMARY reason for donating is for good PR, but (come on) someone in the chain of command thought of it. In the end, who cares why? It was needed, it happened, case closed. Move along!








