| Ping_ii said: http://www.lensoftruth.com/head2head/demo/head2head-killzone-3-beta-vs-crysis-2-demo-performance-analysis/ Although this is a performance analysis, we would like to express that the graphics in Crysis 2 and Killzone 3 appear bars above the competition. First off, it’s clear that Killzone 3 graphics engine has received some major tweaking from it’s predecessor. Considering how bad ass Killzone 2 looked we expected Killzone 3 to look slightly better, but that’s simply not the case. The amount of Deferred lighting, particles and post-processing effects occurring the entire time you’re playing are absolutely mind blowing. Killzone 3 has set the graphical bar once more, and the attention to detail is on a level of its own. Let it be known, Killzone 3 has dethroned Killzone 2 as the best looking First Person Shooter plain and simple. On the other hand, Crysis 2 by no means is not a graphical slouch and Honestly, Killzone 3’s graphics can’t be matched by any other games far. So, the only question that remains, with Killzone 3 being a graphical powerhouse that it is, “what type of performance levels should we expect”? Well, we have the answers you’re looking for.
YOU WANNA TALK GRAPHICS?? I GOT SOME MORE OF THESE ARTICLES FOR YOU JUST HIT ME UP...... |
Lens of truth are a bunch of amateurs Digital foundry are much better and more profesional. Not saying they are wrong in this case but they aren't the best, most knowlagable or most objective arround (they do tend to lean towards 360 especially on non ghraphics topics on their site)
@TheVoxelman on twitter
