Mini reviews of games that reviewers told you to avoid ( they are wrong)

[Doobie_wop]

MaxwellGT2000 said:

Wow... uhm they tell you to stay away from most of those cause those games blow, Neir is the only one thats fun and it did get some good reviews, but even then it's not the most innovative title, but for JRPG standards this gen it's in the top 5 lol.

Also it's Infinite not Infiniti building credibility (for people to trust your opinion) starts with using the correct spelling/name

Edit: Battle Fantasia is a good fighter as well, but it's from the Guility Gear team so it's to be expected, honestly it's better than BlazBlue, but again it had good reviews just no one bought it.

Meh, I base how much I like a game around how much fun I have with them. I've played games that have been borderline broken and I was easliy able to get some fun out of them.

Dead to Rights and Dark Void aren't broken, so they have already gone up and above that factor by adding some interesting gameplay elements and some other pluses (soundtrack, artstyle or whatever).

Also, like I said, Infinite Undiscovery is a stupid name, I had a slight aneurysm by just typing it.

BlazBlue is better, but I do prefer Battle Fantasia's art style.

I'm not a reviewer, I'm just a dude, a dude on a mission and that mission is to get people to play the lost and the damned, the fallen and down trodden and hopefully keep the C to B grade game alive. I am 65 and Below Man.