TRios_Zen said:
And what makes you think I didn't? Just because I came away with a different conclusion then you? I've read multiple reviews, including IGN (85) and this Gamespot (80), and NEITHER the score nor the text is representative of a BAD game. Do you refute that? |
You mentioned review scores specifically in your post but that's not what I'm talking about. A reviewer can give a positive impression (and score) of a game but someone can read and know they won't like aspects of the game. Alternatively, a review can be negative but can still give enough info for people to decide that they may actually like the game.
In this case, myself (and a number of others) know that even with positive reviews, that many of the mechanics described have been simplified or altered to a point where we see it as detrimental.
Take the PC Gamer review which gave the game its highest review so far (a 94). From reading the details in the reviews I know there are aspects of the game I'm not going to like, even though they had a hugely positive review.








