mibuokami said:
Sorry the use of 'foreign occupation' is incorrect, the phrase is too tied to colonialism and has too much negative connotation, I apologise if anyone is offended. It's call a no win scenario because once WMD is used then nobody wins. Before it comes to the point that's been shown in homefront, you can bet your ass that a sub full of nuke will rain hell in the invader's homeland. It won't take a lot of multi-megaton nuke to reduce North Korea into no-man land. When a country loses its production and manufactoring capability it cannot sustain a war, the frontline is only half the reason wars are won and lost and it's often not the most important half. |
Before everyone makes their conclusion without actually playing the game or understanding how they deal with such issues, I suggest that they wait and see how the plot comes out. The problem with Americans is that we believe we are untouchable, which lead to 911. Do not forget that our country is very vunerable to a ground war especially with how easy it is to knock out most of America power infrastructure. There are a few books out there that talks about this and the fact we have nukes doesn't mean we are safe. I can see a bunch of scenerios where the US could find itself in such a situation described in Homefront. If the US economy falls, we would be selling nukes left and right like Russia to keep our economy stable. The plot is not far reaching if you think what would happen if the US economy tanked.








