| oniyide said: @lordtheknight even if what you say is true about winning people back, why would they??? Developers would literally have to bend over backwards to get Wii owners to play FPSs on that system. YOur competing with HALO, better COD, Killzone, Borderlands, Bioshock, L4D, Resistance, I could go on and on, you really think an average gamer in his/her right mind would leave that for Conduit??? Not going to happen, oh you might get the occasional multiplat owner who might check out a WIi FPS, but that game would have to be freaking amazing, GE for instance and you know what? even that game pales in comparasion to some of the HDs/PC games. No voice chat??? in 2011, no updates??? |
They wouldn't have to bend over backwards. First of all, there are loads of FPS from the last gen that the Wii could handle. Just release them with some extra features, and some actual marketing. Then put some other FPS on the system, either original or ported from the other systems (at reasonable prices or extra features to make up for the lost time).
No, that would not be hard. They could make a lot of jobs getting more people and companies to do so. The only read hard thing would be admitting they were wrong and that it's a problem THEY have to fix, not the Wii customers (and don't try any of that crap about how we are in the wrong, as if we are obligated to buy games that don't interest us and/or don't even know exists due to lack of marketing).
I'm not claiming it's likely to happen, ONLY that it's possible, and their responsibility, and their failure if they don't do it.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs
