| oniyide said: @lordtheknight that might have been too strong of teminology, but IMHO compared to the other systems fighting games have kind of been passing the Ninty systems by since the end of SNES era, hell I dont even this there was a 2d fighter on N64 outside of SSB. Thats why I thought that more people would have flocked to Tvs.C a bit faster, here you have a VS. game thats exclusive on Wii, I mean it wasnt like there were alot of other fighters out there to choose from, but on the other hand there is a large amount of multiplat owners who probably didnt care or was just content to stick it out with Mvs.C2 HD. Im a fighting freak so i gobble up anything Capcom will throw my way. There loss I guess and yeah Capcom has done weird stuff. Not that i would have bought it but they could have done a original RE for Wii I mean for god's sake they did it three times for GC (I count the remake as an original, seeing as it was made from the ground up) |
The notion of gobbling up is part of a fallacy that when it comes genre or type, one game is a good as the other. Just because there was a fighting game doesn't mean we will flock to it. If it's good, we will buy it, but not in the numbers of the big series because, now try to follow this because it's a pretty big leap, it's not one of the big series. Vs overall is not as huge as the Street Fighter series, or the specific popular Capcom Vs games.
Imagine if Fighter's History got put on a system, and a gaming company assumes that is the test for how Street Fighter II would do on that system.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs
