I find the logic in "real games" somewhat flawed... Thinking of what kind of games the "real games" are, when most of them have lots of cinematics and often the game is focused on those. Then someone comes and says, that a game, which focuses solely on gameplay, isn't a "real game". Like Wii Sports and Wii Play.
If we think that the hardcore games are something that's focus is on gameplay (which they usually are), Wii Sports and Wii Play are more hardcore games than any game S-E have released in the last 10 years.
I was just few weeks ago debating about game developers and publishers complaining about the Wii and i stated that they complain for 2 reasons, which are that they bet the wrong horse and therefore are possibly losing a lot of money and the other reason was that they complain because they need to make something new for the Wii, instead of re-inventing all the old games with different name and characters.
I also think that, as someone pointed out, not having a dominant console may serve S-E (and other devs) better than having one, since that way they could get the best possible deals for their games from console manufacturers.
Ei Kiinasti.
Eikä Japanisti.
Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.
Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.
