| Demonslayersoultaker said:
Both ways I'm right
Disagree movies do not equal games, a successful game format does not equal a successful format.
space equals image quality...
You can fit a whole blu-ray movie onto a dvd, so no thats not the case, a lot of multi plats look better on the 360 even while having an install on the ps3
Again unique formats work for gaming all the time, since it's Sony, Nintendo and MS that deceide what the games go on, and a codec that's it who the hell cares about a codec it's nothing compared to what Sony makes off blu rays, and thats assuming you aren't wrong about MSes codecs being on blu ray and it won't fail you have nothing to suggest it will
Do research I am not defending about the codecs. h.264/mpeg4 and mpeg2 are both 2 of the 3 encodings used by blu-ray. VC-1 is the other and also developed by MS. I have done my research.
I never said digital distribution wasn't growing just that it wouldn't replace physical on home consoles and movies and blu ray IS successful now and FFXIII's drop in textures was because of the 360 having less disk space not to mention the cut content and thats with multiple disks
No thats not why that was Square-Enix's excuse, enough people have pulled it apart and seen that its not the case, I am not having this discussion because it is off topic.
Lets see what makes more sense, devs not making games that need installs because MS won't let it through and it will reduce their userbase since there's an arcade model or because you say so? PC games use dvds and always have installs
PC games have much much more compression then either the PS3 or Xbox360, in fact it also looks better, you just proposed an argument against the blu-ray I will let it lie though because I don't think that was your meaning.
|
