Demonslayersoultaker said:
Plubishers publish movies too...
And you were talking about games
You keep asking for proof yet providing none, and you've never seen a blu ray have you, and in terms of mediums for games/movies more space low production cost = better tech, what do you think better tech is?
Dont make me take a picture of my collection, I have blu-rays yes, but in terms of space is all blu-rays have over DVD's not image quality, in that they are the same.
And you are trying to say better tech is making it look better, that is not the case.
What? None of that makes sense, gaming is indirectly related to movies at best, Sony makes money off of blu rays not MS, and blu ray will last because I don't see a need for games or movies to exceed 50 GB anytime soon and even if they do Sony already has a 100 GB blu ray made and digital distribution will grow but it won't replace physical media your the one that needs to do research
You are talking about a format, this is repetitive, a format has to do with movies more than games. If it fails for movies it will fail as a format. More people watch movies than play games. Yes MS also makes money out of blu-rays. Ms owns a shite load of codecs, a few of them are used in the ps3 and blu-ray players, believe me or dont, i dont care at this point.
Again productions costs for usb sticks and HDDs of comparible size are much higher, and again blu ray is faster then dvd and holds more what the hell is your point, and again if MS didn't have the arcade model (no HDD) a ton of games would need install and again there are 360 games that need install they are just few and old why do I have to repeat everything to you? More disk space = more potential content, better textures and more complicated programs in the games compare that to a slightly lower read speed and I think the extra space wins out
My point is that to be a successful format Blu-rays have to cover all these, CD's when released, same as DVD's did this, now its getting done by DD, do you own a portable hard drive and or a usb? If that is the case, you are giving creedence to DD. Name the games or don't talk crap. MS has compensated more than enough in this regard, FFXIII wasnt done half arsedly because of the space it was done that way because of laziness, enough developers have come out and said as much. So far as far as I know there is no game that cant be done on the 360 that can be done on the PS3.
Again no installs is cuz of arcade model not dvd, and it's a pain in the ass for devs
No its not because of the arcade model, the arcade model was brought out because you should have to install on the 360. It is speed, or games wouldnt run as quick. Forza 3 did the extra space for content, nothing to do with speed in that aspect, hence why it is not needed.
Games have to have a certain standard in terms of how well it looks, more room for that means you have more room left for game, and for programs stuff like AI's and combat machanics which most certainly do make a better game
AI? Name one game definitely on the PS3 that has better AI than they 360. or combat mechanics. If there is none you are talking bollocks. I am not needing proof as I am not talking out of my bum.
|
