Demonslayersoultaker said:
I didnt say gaming I said movies, read comprehension is good for you.
Plubishers publish movies too...
It is more space yes, not better technology, as far as I know HD DVD was in fact that, blu-ray is more space, they are two different things. Digital distribution can in fact match them... and is. Go to torrentz.com and type in any movie or show with 1080p or 720p... matched... Not condoning piracy but that is just wrong. Proof why you think Blu-ray is going to takeover... I havent seen it yet. Ha really if you want to own a collection blu-ray is your only option, I know people that have more than 1 thousand movies on certain hard drives, if you take out crap like bonus features blu-ray discs become much much smaller, and can come down to about 1-2 gb
You keep asking for proof yet providing none, and you've never seen a blu ray have you, and in terms of mediums for games/movies more space low production cost = better tech, what do you think better tech is?
Actually as I said Gaming is directly linked to Movies if you are talking about a successful format, although popular, wii's discs will never catch on. It will never be the successful format, Blu-ray was used because of movies, dont seperate them please. MS makes money on every ps3 because of Blu-ray technologies, research is your friend. I would love to see proof how you think Blu-ray will last till nextgen ps because as far as the news articles seem to say the next ps is put on hold.
What? None of that makes sense, gaming is indirectly related to movies at best, Sony makes money off of blu rays not MS, and blu ray will last because I don't see a need for games or movies to exceed 50 GB anytime soon and even if they do Sony already has a 100 GB blu ray made and digital distribution will grow but it won't replace physical media your the one that needs to do research
Considering you are currently coming back to gaming we have to talk about PS3's slow Blu-ray player, so as far as GAMING is concerned DVD's are better in spite of space, but speed. Please rip apart my arguments and explain which is baseless, this is not the first conversation I have had abou this topic. So you prefer to use a blu-ray disc to transport data rather than a hdd, if thats the case fine... you are one of the few. The majority of people seem to be skipping blu-rays and head straight to usb sticks, port hdds. No there are no games that need installing, kinect as a hardware device needs installing. Forza 3 can be played without installing... no games need installation on the 360. Tell me which games because you seem to be wrong in this case.
Again productions costs for usb sticks and HDDs of comparible size are much higher, and again blu ray is faster then dvd and holds more what the hell is your point, and again if MS didn't have the arcade model (no HDD) a ton of games would need install and again there are 360 games that need install they are just few and old why do I have to repeat everything to you? More disk space = more potential content, better textures and more complicated programs in the games compare that to a slightly lower read speed and I think the extra space wins out
Optional installs yes, but that is too make the dvd drive softer and the game to run quickers its not required, you can still play the game without it.
Again no installs is cuz of arcade model not dvd, and it's a pain in the ass for devs
in your brackets a better game does not make. More content, possibly, higher res textures, a better game does not necessarily need this, look at braid for example. more room for complicated programs... wtf?
Games have to have a certain standard in terms of how well it looks, more room for that means you have more room left for game, and for programs stuff like AI's and combat machanics not to mention the engine itself which most certainly do make a better game
|
