Toastrules said:
MonstaMack said:
It's kinda funny actually.
Prior to the Kinect bundles the 360 was the cheapest option at $199 (before the Wii price drop) and a lot of Sony fans said that the more expensive console was selling just as well. But now when you factor in people buying Arcades with the Kinect ($300) and the expensive 250gig with Kinect ($400) I'd say the playing field is more even, and that Microsoft is doing better as the higher priced console - especially when you factor in $60 a year for live and people buying hard drives for their arcades ($130 MSRP) and some wireless adaptors for the old units ($100).
Microsoft has the advantage here over the PS3. Not the other way around.
|
Mmhmm... Not to be offending or anything, but it makes me sick seeing how much money Microsoft is making through Xbox and Kinect, while this is the year of the Ps3, and the fact that PSN is free, and the fact that Sony let consumers buy their own hard drives, and the fact that the Ps3 came with WiFi already in...
I try my best not to put my pro-Sony feelings in statements that I make, but honestly, Microsoft is making so much more than Sony, while Sony is trying, and failing, to please it's customers and make large amounts of money at the same time.
What the hell is Sony doing wrong?
|
They aren't advertising enough/right in USA thats about it, and Sony's goals aren't the same as MSes, ps3 being used to get them more blu ray royalties and sell 3D tvs and stuff making money directly off of ps3 isn't as important to them as increasing sales of their other products
