| MonstaMack said: It's kinda funny actually. Prior to the Kinect bundles the 360 was the cheapest option at $199 (before the Wii price drop) and a lot of Sony fans said that the more expensive console was selling just as well. But now when you factor in people buying Arcades with the Kinect ($300) and the expensive 250gig with Kinect ($400) I'd say the playing field is more even, and that Microsoft is doing better as the higher priced console - especially when you factor in $60 a year for live and people buying hard drives for their arcades ($130 MSRP) and some wireless adaptors for the old units ($100). Microsoft has the advantage here over the PS3. Not the other way around. |
that basically sumed up my thoughts quite well actually.
there was always this "what if.." when it came to price before. now they have been more-or-less equalized and the 360 is doing on par to slightly ahead in unit sales with what is probably somewhat stunted sales.
