| Kasz216 said: I'd just go with incompetant... I mean...
Though honestly, who knows. CNN and MSNBC might just make as many mistakes and just don't have as many people botherin them. |
Is that really a screen capture from Fox? That's terrible if it is.
And if these are genuine mistakes, then they're terrible journalists. Still, some mistakes may be genuine, but I'm convinced that the make a lot of these "mistakes" on purpose.
One example of a mistake that I thought could have only been done on purpose was in a Bill O'Reilly interview with Richard Dawkins, during which Bill O'Reilly insisted on calling Richard Dawkins "Mr Dawkins" whenever he used his name, which he seemed to use in every other sentence. I think just about everyone who knows who Richard Dawkins is knows that he goes by either "Professor Dawkins" or "Dr Dawkins", heck, even Calling him "Richard" or just "Dawkins" would have been fine. I find it incredibly hard to believe that O'Reilly, a man who must know who Richard Dawkins is fairly well, would make the mistake of calling him Mr Dawkins and then repeat his mistake over and over again. I think it's more likely that he called him "Mr Dawkins" to try and distort how the viewers see him.
