By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Immortal said:
Rainbird said:

I tried to generalize where I could and not focus on specific features, and I did it with both of them.

And startling is a pretty strong compliment (certainly in line with beautiful in my opinion), but you can't serouisly tell me it doesn't have its flaws. Only one person can view it properly, the viewing angle is very limited (meaning you can easily "break" the 3D), there are reports of people feeling bad after using it and the 3DS is equipped with motion sensors, meaning if you want to game using motion controls, you need to turn off the 3D.

And every impression we've had of the OLED screen is that it is beautiful. And it doesn't really have any flaws so far as I know, so beautiful seemed appropriate.

Well, now it seems better. Was just pointing out the subjectivity of it, not trying to argue against it.

I really don't think it's a fair comparison, though - we've had fewer impressions of the OLED screen so we have fewer faults. I mean, you might as well say that the 3DS has so many more quality games releasing since we know so little about NGP's line-up so far.

But we still know a lot about OLED screens in general and their general qualities. There's nothing about this screen that shouldn't at least be on par with common LCD screens, and it should perform better in almost every area, which seems pretty much in line with previews so far. There's a difference between how much you need to sample a new screen and a lense splitting images and sending them to each eye anyway.

But I think I'm just going to remove both startling and beautiful, because people are reading way too much into that.