VGC Mafia Round 25

[Linkzmax]

Wonktonodi said:

A Bad Clown said:

Wonktonodi said:

snip

Why would you need the prof to see if heph was a problem?  Or were you trying to mean you wanted to wait for the prof to be posting more so you could have your thoughts on him.  If the second is what you meant no one got that from your wording.

The second, sort of. I wantedto see prof post along with heph but that time I just wanted to see all the players start conversing and prof and tangent were the only ones not. I would have mentioned Tangent but he said he was gone and would come back yesterday...where the hell is tanget anyways?

Ok that makes sence but I hope you see how your wording caused people confusing and by not clearing it up makes you look worse.  I still have the other questions.  I requoted the post just a few of my posts back.

I was hopeful that my brain would figure some things out in my sleep, albeit a short sleep, last night, but no luck. Since I may not be able to come on at all today I think it's best that I point this out now in case ABC is lynched. More timestamp fun:

A Bad Clown on 02/10/11 17:30 EST

 

Wonktonodi said:

A Bad Clown said:

I might have to vote against nonome after the day one accusation, unlesss heph is still playing. I'm confused who's voting for who so far, it shows Stef voting twice

bad clown take a look if someoen else explains is sooner or beter my apologies.

Current votes (6 needed to lynch):

[0, L-6] Linkzmax:  (theprof00), (Stefl1504)

[0, L-6] Stefl1504:  (noname2200)

[1, L-5] noname2200: theprof00

[1, L-5] theprof00: Stefl1504

[0, L-6] trashleg: (Hephaestos)

[1, L-5] A Bad Clown: noname2200

 

the number on the far left is the number of current votes.  when a persons name is in brakets that means he(or she) voted for that person but is no longer voting for that person.

Ok, I'll wait for the prof to check him out to see if he could be bad news

trangentspree on 02/10/11 18:17 EST

 

I'm here, got my PM.

I wouldn't really regard myself as late as the game started less than 12 hours ago, but for those wondering, I have been out of the house all day long, first at work and then at a friend's house for dinner.

I'm pretty knackered and heading to bed. I'll have most of the day to post tomorrow. One or two things have caught my eye already.

So it's another case of ABC later using things that happened in the future to try to explain actions in the past. I think it's just ABC making far too many assumptions and now using anything in the thread to try to validate those assumptions; however, in case he gets lynched and it turns out tomorrow I'm wrong, I just want to point out how Wonk cleared this as making sense. I believe Wonk's too good to not check out a story to see if it really makes sense, so this gives me the impression that this line of questioning was truly artificial.(I'm undecided on the interaction with radish)

I swear there was more, but my mind is a fog and I'm running late for work. If I have a chance I'll try to remember and post it.