By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 13 February 2011
Edit Thread
drkohler said:
Oblivion86 said:


You are completely hopeless, when a seller overships and they are not sold within the market-share timeframe those units are not paid for shipped back to the company. Why can you not understand this?

I can assure you this is definitely not how the real world works. Do your really think a retailer can order whatever he likes and then simply ship back what s/he can't sell. What a delusional concept. Just promise us you never go into the retail business, you would not survive a year with such a weird (non-)understanding of how the business works.

There can be agreements to accept itens and just paying for the ones you sell... but even so sony wouldn't happly ship consoles no one wants forever... and they forgot that even if they say sony overships VG still put PS3 numbers rising every quarter, and gaps shrinking...

but don't care if people are delusional



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."